<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wine Review Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts from a far off place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Lobel</title>
		<link>http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Lobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Might try &quot;http://wine-reviewer.com/&quot;.  It&#039;s relatively new and doesn&#039;t have a large selection of reviews, but is a good site to springboard from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might try &#8220;http://wine-reviewer.com/&#8221;.  It&#8217;s relatively new and doesn&#8217;t have a large selection of reviews, but is a good site to springboard from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wine</title>
		<link>http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>wine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distantparts.com/2006/05/25/43/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>But overall, I like the site and the service. At the very least, its significantly more useful than the personalization options offered by Winespectator for a fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But overall, I like the site and the service. At the very least, its significantly more useful than the personalization options offered by Winespectator for a fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
